Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Add idempotency keys to mutating endpoints

API surface and contracts|The work pauses once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, and the run continues from there.

Mutating endpoints that duplicate work on a retry, given idempotency keys with a replay test.

The ticket

Add idempotency key support to mutating endpoints.

Acceptance criteria

  • A repeated request with the same key produces one effect
  • The stored result is returned for the replay rather than an error
  • Keys expire on a stated schedule
  • A test replays a request and asserts a single effect

What lands as proof

A replay test asserting exactly one effect from two identical calls, which is the whole promise.

Why teams defer it

  • Duplicates are rare and get cleaned up by hand, so the cost stays hidden in support time.
  • Storing and expiring keys correctly needs a storage decision, which pulls in another owner.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: add idempotency key support to mutating endpoints. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means replay test proving one effect from two identical calls, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
The run stops once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, which is the cheapest moment to redirect the work.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.