Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Replace ad-hoc prints with the project logger

Observability and operability|Everything this ticket has to prove is checked by machine, so it can be handed over as it is. A person still reads the pull request and decides whether to merge it.

Debug prints left in production code, replaced with structured logging a query can reach.

The ticket

Replace ad-hoc print statements across one service with the project's structured logger.

Acceptance criteria

  • No print statements remain in the service
  • Each replacement carries a level and structured fields rather than an interpolated string
  • A lint rule blocks the old call from returning
  • Tests assert the structured output where the message matters

What lands as proof

A lint rule failing on a seeded print, which is what stops this being undone next week.

Why teams defer it

  • A print works locally, which is where the person adding it is standing.
  • Nobody notices the cost until an incident needs a query and the logs are unstructured text.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: replace ad-hoc print statements across one service with the project's structured logger. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means a rule blocks the old call, tests assert the new one, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
None is required before the run starts. Every claim this ticket makes can be checked by machine, so the agent works straight through and a person reviews the finished pull request like any other.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.