Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Set artifact retention so storage stops growing

Build, containers, and artifacts|The work pauses for the plan, and the review bar is raised so that smaller suggestions also block the merge, not only serious findings.

Build artefacts kept forever by default, given a retention policy with the storage trend attached.

The ticket

Define and apply a retention policy for build artefacts.

Acceptance criteria

  • A retention period is set per artefact type with a rationale
  • Artefacts needed for compliance or rollback are excluded and named
  • The storage trend is attached before and after
  • The policy is documented where the pipeline is documented

What lands as proof

The storage trend before and after, with the excluded artefact types named explicitly.

Why teams defer it

  • Storage is cheap per build and expensive per year, and nobody sees the annual number.
  • Deleting an artefact somebody needed for a rollback is unrecoverable, so the exclusions matter more than the policy.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: define and apply a retention policy for build artefacts. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means policy documented, storage trend attached, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
The run stops for the plan, and the review bar is raised afterwards so that smaller suggestions block the merge too, not only serious findings.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.