Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Verify one critical flow across the supported browsers

Accessibility and browser verification|The work pauses once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, and the run continues from there.

A flow only ever tested in one browser, run across the supported set with a trace kept from each.

The ticket

Run one critical flow across every supported browser and fix what differs.

Acceptance criteria

  • The flow completes in each supported browser
  • A trace from each run is attached
  • Differences found are fixed or documented with a reason
  • The browser list matches what the product actually claims to support

What lands as proof

One trace per browser, which turns a claim of cross-browser support into something a reader can check.

Why teams defer it

  • Everybody develops in the same browser, so differences surface through support tickets rather than tests.
  • Running the other browsers locally needs a harness nobody has set up yet.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: run one critical flow across every supported browser and fix what differs. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means a trace per browser attached to the pull request, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
The run stops once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, which is the cheapest moment to redirect the work.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.